Maybe they call it “strategy execution” for a reason

It appears that strategy formulation works well, yet still 70% of all strategies fail. The fault, dear Brutus, must be in strategy execution. Let’s look at some of the reasons:

Strategic Goals: Some key questions. What are the key goals that make up the strategy? How do the goals relate to each other? How do we know when the strategy is complete?  What are the key performance indicators that define strategy success?

Management Fatigue: Once a strategy has been formulated, there is a long road ahead to get the strategy up and running. Perhaps senior management may get bored. Boredom is contagious and can quickly infect the strategy project.

Strategy accountability: One or more executives must be accountable for the strategy. Accountability is a public event, and must be monitored over time. Remember that for many people working on a strategy, this is not their day job. So accountability should also be accompanied by incentives.

Task Accountability: A strategy consists of numerous goals or initiatives. Initiatives require that projects be completed.  These projects have tasks and milestones. Tasks and milestones are complete when there is a tangible deliverable that can be reviewed by management.

“Percent Complete” is perilous: Why is it that we are trying to transform major companies using primitive project management techniques? Real strategies require an Earned Value approach (where each task has an associated value which is earned when the task is complete, and a real deliverable produced) - which is simple to learn. Remember what they say about percent complete: “The first 90% of the project goes much faster than the last 90% of the project.” By the way, I think this blog is 90% compete.

So, when does the strategy really end?

Say one of your major goals is to build a new factory in China. Is the strategy over when the factory is up and live? Is the strategy over when the factory runs efficiently, using KPIs you have defined? Is the strategy over when the products produced by this new factory add materially to the Company’s bottom line?

No strategy is an island: It is important to recognize that many things tie to strategy and conversely. Those things include:

  1. The budget
  2. Cash plan
  3. Capital plan
  4. Human Resources Plan
  5. Operating Plan
  6. Sales Plan

Make sure that the nascent strategy is consistent with all major planning efforts in the company.

What to do: You will need strategy management software. Make sure that the software has the requisite components. Make sure that the customers of the strategy management software vendor have often completed successful strategies. Find out whether the software firm’s consultants or third party consultants were instrumental in the success of the strategy.

You don’t need a boutique consulting firm (unless you are having trouble with strategy formulation). This is all about blocking and tackling for strategy execution.

Make sure that all participants in the strategy have skin in the game. If you keep your eye on the ball, you can win!

About these ads

About Barry Wilderman

Barry Wilderman has over 30 years of experience as an industry analyst, researcher and consultant. He is a highly regarded public speaker, and has spoken at numerous business events around the world. I am pleased to offer a set of value-driven improvement services to buyers and vendors of Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) solutions: For buyers of EPM solutions: EPM solutions are crucial to meet the needs of the Corporate Finance and Corporate Strategy departments. Therefore, there must be a successful collaboration between IT and top corporate executives to select, implement and support EPM software. We help make sure you get it right. For vendors of EPM solutions: This is one of the most visible application areas – what an audience to sell to! We are here to help ensure you are truly delivering value (both product and services) – and marketing your competitive advantage. Barry’s approach to research and consulting has been shaped by a number of critical job experiences: At META Group, Barry managed a team of enterprise application analysts focused on issues of selecting software, selecting the best consulting firm(s), implementation strategy and success factors beyond the go-live date. This work spanned numerous industries and horizontal disciplines. His clients were both enterprise vendors and companies implementing enterprise software. At Lawson Software, Barry was able to apply a great deal of the META research in the practical world of an enterprise vendor. He coordinated a series of studies around Lawson’s Business Intelligence and financial solutions. He also managed a team of value consultants who helped companies model their pain points and translate those pain points into quantifiable benefits. Early in Barry’s career, he worked at McKinsey and Company, where he managed an analytic services group, working on delivering value in client engagements. Barry also worked for Information Builders, where he helped shape its approach to third party application delivery and artificial intelligence. Barry holds a BS from City College of New York and MS Degrees from Brown University and New York University. :
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s